1 |
I thought gentoo would only give you versions of software that were |
2 |
considered mainstream upstream, that the ~ was only for the ebuilds. |
3 |
|
4 |
J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
> On Monday, November 10, 2014 08:06:50 AM covici@××××××××××.com wrote: |
7 |
> > Then they should not change the catalog version -- what is that, anyway? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> You are using a Beta-version. Those are under development and NOT suited for |
10 |
> production. |
11 |
> If you use a beta-version of any software package, you run the risk of loosing |
12 |
> your data. |
13 |
> I am not surprised that the layout of the on-disk storage changes between beta |
14 |
> versions while the devs try to implement new functionality. |
15 |
> You might even have been running with an incompatible combination in the |
16 |
> previous beta. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> -- |
19 |
> Joost |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
> > Vladimir Romanov <blueboar2@×××××.com> wrote: |
23 |
> > > Well, i think i understand what happens (through i am not sure) - i was |
24 |
> > > upgrading 9.3 to 9.4 - they're installed in different slots, so i just |
25 |
> > > istalled two postgresql's in one time. You are upgrading 9.4 to 9.4 - so |
26 |
> > > they are in one slot and can not be installed in one time. |
27 |
> > > |
28 |
> > > But then yes, one can't upgrade the base. |
29 |
> > > |
30 |
> > > 2014-11-10 17:59 GMT+05:00 <covici@××××××××××.com>: |
31 |
> > > > Well, I found the old binaries in my backups and did the deed, the only |
32 |
> > > > problems, was that the old data directory did not contain any .conf |
33 |
> > > > files, so I copied the new ones into the old data directory and it was |
34 |
> > > > then happy. I m not sure what happened to the .conf files in the old |
35 |
> > > > data directory, but they had not been there for quite a while, so maybe |
36 |
> > > > this was a problem with the arlier beta. Very strange but it looks |
37 |
> > > > good. |
38 |
> > > > |
39 |
> > > > Thanks for your help. |
40 |
> > > > |
41 |
> > > > Vladimir Romanov <blueboar2@×××××.com> wrote: |
42 |
> > > > > Well... then we need someone, who is more professional, since AFAIK |
43 |
> > > > > multiple postgresql's can be on one system in several slots. Maybe (as |
44 |
> > > > > it |
45 |
> > > > > is beta, slots are the same, therefore new deletes old and vice |
46 |
> > > > > versa)? |
47 |
> > > > > |
48 |
> > > > > 2014-11-10 16:47 GMT+05:00 <covici@××××××××××.com>: |
49 |
> > > > > > What it does then is delete the beta3 and give me only beta2. This |
50 |
> > > > > > is |
51 |
> > > > > > what I had done to fix my original problem, I can show you the build |
52 |
> > > > |
53 |
> > > > log |
54 |
> > > > |
55 |
> > > > > > for beta3 if that would help. I am using gentoo-unstable, but that |
56 |
> > > > > > should be obvious. |
57 |
> > > > > > |
58 |
> > > > > > Vladimir Romanov <blueboar2@×××××.com> wrote: |
59 |
> > > > > > > You updated your beta2 with beta3. Now you can add beta2 again by |
60 |
> > > > |
61 |
> > > > emerge |
62 |
> > > > |
63 |
> > > > > > > =dev-db/posgresql-9.4-beta2 (or something like) |
64 |
> > > > > > > |
65 |
> > > > > > > 2014-11-10 16:36 GMT+05:00 <covici@××××××××××.com>: |
66 |
> > > > > > > > Well, after the emerge, no sign of beta2 anywhere, I have the |
67 |
> > > > |
68 |
> > > > directory |
69 |
> > > > |
70 |
> > > > > > > > /usr/lib64/postgresql-9.4/ with the beta3 binaries and that is |
71 |
> > > > |
72 |
> > > > all, is |
73 |
> > > > |
74 |
> > > > > > > > there a problem with the ebuilds or something? |
75 |
> > > > > > > > |
76 |
> > > > > > > > Vladimir Romanov <blueboar2@×××××.com> wrote: |
77 |
> > > > > > > > > Well, emerge it again :). You can have two postgresql-servers |
78 |
> > > > > > > > > in |
79 |
> > > > > > > > |
80 |
> > > > > > > > different |
81 |
> > > > > > > > |
82 |
> > > > > > > > > slots. |
83 |
> > > > > > > > > |
84 |
> > > > > > > > > 2014-11-10 16:21 GMT+05:00 <covici@××××××××××.com>: |
85 |
> > > > > > > > > > However, when I emerge beta3, beta2 is gone, so this is my |
86 |
> > > > |
87 |
> > > > problem. |
88 |
> > > > |
89 |
> > > > > > > > > > Vladimir Romanov <blueboar2@×××××.com> wrote: |
90 |
> > > > > > > > > > > Yes. You emerge both beta2 and beta3, then run pg_upgrade |
91 |
> > > > > > > > > > > for |
92 |
> > > > > > |
93 |
> > > > > > beta3, |
94 |
> > > > > > |
95 |
> > > > > > > > > > > provide BOTH binaries to it, it converts the base. Then |
96 |
> > > > > > > > > > > you |
97 |
> > > > |
98 |
> > > > can |
99 |
> > > > |
100 |
> > > > > > > > delete |
101 |
> > > > > > > > |
102 |
> > > > > > > > > > > beta2. |
103 |
> > > > > > > > > > > |
104 |
> > > > > > > > > > > 2014-11-10 16:04 GMT+05:00 <covici@××××××××××.com>: |
105 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi. I have a puzzle regarding upgrading postgresql. In |
106 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > my |
107 |
> > > > > > |
108 |
> > > > > > recent |
109 |
> > > > > > |
110 |
> > > > > > > > > > world |
111 |
> > > > > > > > > > |
112 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > update I went from 9.4_beta2 to beta3, but when I tried |
113 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > to |
114 |
> > > > > > |
115 |
> > > > > > start |
116 |
> > > > > > |
117 |
> > > > > > > > the |
118 |
> > > > > > > > |
119 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > server, it complained that the databases were written |
120 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > with |
121 |
> > > > |
122 |
> > > > a |
123 |
> > > > |
124 |
> > > > > > > > different |
125 |
> > > > > > > > |
126 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > "catalog version" -- whatever that is, and the |
127 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > pg_upgrade |
128 |
> > > > |
129 |
> > > > tool |
130 |
> > > > |
131 |
> > > > > > > > requires |
132 |
> > > > > > > > |
133 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > both old and new binaries to actually upgrade the |
134 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > database. |
135 |
> > > > > > |
136 |
> > > > > > So as |
137 |
> > > > > > |
138 |
> > > > > > > > a |
139 |
> > > > > > > > |
140 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > temporary measure, I went back to beta2 and things |
141 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > worked |
142 |
> > > > > > |
143 |
> > > > > > again. |
144 |
> > > > > > |
145 |
> > > > > > > > So |
146 |
> > > > > > > > |
147 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > what the heck are you supposed to do here, I like pg, |
148 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > but |
149 |
> > > > |
150 |
> > > > this |
151 |
> > > > |
152 |
> > > > > > is |
153 |
> > > > > > |
154 |
> > > > > > > > very |
155 |
> > > > > > > > |
156 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > strange to me. |
157 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > |
158 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance for any suggestions. |
159 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > |
160 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > -- |
161 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. |
162 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > The |
163 |
> > > > > > |
164 |
> > > > > > question |
165 |
> > > > > > |
166 |
> > > > > > > > is: |
167 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > How do |
168 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > you spend it? |
169 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > |
170 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > John Covici |
171 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > covici@××××××××××.com |
172 |
> > > > > > > > > > > |
173 |
> > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
174 |
> > > > > > > > > > > Alternatives: |
175 |
> > > > > > > > > > > |
176 |
> > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
177 |
> > > > > > > > > > |
178 |
> > > > > > > > > > -- |
179 |
> > > > > > > > > > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The |
180 |
> > > > |
181 |
> > > > question |
182 |
> > > > |
183 |
> > > > > > is: |
184 |
> > > > > > > > > > How do |
185 |
> > > > > > > > > > you spend it? |
186 |
> > > > > > > > > > |
187 |
> > > > > > > > > > John Covici |
188 |
> > > > > > > > > > covici@××××××××××.com |
189 |
> > > > > > > > > |
190 |
> > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
191 |
> > > > > > > > > Alternatives: |
192 |
> > > > > > > > > |
193 |
> > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
194 |
> > > > > > > > |
195 |
> > > > > > > > -- |
196 |
> > > > > > > > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The |
197 |
> > > > > > > > question |
198 |
> > > > |
199 |
> > > > is: |
200 |
> > > > > > > > How do |
201 |
> > > > > > > > you spend it? |
202 |
> > > > > > > > |
203 |
> > > > > > > > John Covici |
204 |
> > > > > > > > covici@××××××××××.com |
205 |
> > > > > > > |
206 |
> > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
207 |
> > > > > > > Alternatives: |
208 |
> > > > > > > |
209 |
> > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
210 |
> > > > > > |
211 |
> > > > > > -- |
212 |
> > > > > > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question |
213 |
> > > > > > is: |
214 |
> > > > > > How do |
215 |
> > > > > > you spend it? |
216 |
> > > > > > |
217 |
> > > > > > John Covici |
218 |
> > > > > > covici@××××××××××.com |
219 |
> > > > > |
220 |
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
221 |
> > > > > Alternatives: |
222 |
> > > > > |
223 |
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
224 |
> > > > |
225 |
> > > > -- |
226 |
> > > > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
227 |
> > > > How do |
228 |
> > > > you spend it? |
229 |
> > > > |
230 |
> > > > John Covici |
231 |
> > > > covici@××××××××××.com |
232 |
> > > |
233 |
> > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
234 |
> > > Alternatives: |
235 |
> > > |
236 |
> > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
237 |
> |
238 |
|
239 |
-- |
240 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
241 |
How do |
242 |
you spend it? |
243 |
|
244 |
John Covici |
245 |
covici@××××××××××.com |