1 |
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
2 |
<volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> Am Mittwoch 09 November 2011, 10:22:42 schrieb Mark Knecht: |
4 |
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
7 |
>> > Am Montag 07 November 2011, 10:28:41 schrieb J. Roeleveld: |
8 |
>> >> On Sun, November 6, 2011 6:49 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
9 |
>> >> > Am Samstag 05 November 2011, 20:45:15 schrieb Joost Roeleveld: |
10 |
>> >> >> Virtualbox has decent USB-pass-through support. Even quite high |
11 |
>> >> >> performance. |
12 |
>> >> >> |
13 |
>> >> >> > Thanks for your help. I do appreciate it |
14 |
>> >> > |
15 |
>> >> > virtualbox is also pretty broken at the moment. |
16 |
>> >> |
17 |
>> >> Broken in what way? |
18 |
>> >> I am happily using it without any issues. |
19 |
>> > |
20 |
>> > the worst way: |
21 |
>> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk5Mw |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> Yeah, it was sort of fun to watch that thread as it occurred on LKML. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> Personally I felt the Phoronix article was a bit of a troll as the |
26 |
>> best he could do personally was say that he had problems a year ago, |
27 |
>> but I believe the kernel devs are telling the truth as best they know |
28 |
>> it about the number of bug reports they get. Let's remember however |
29 |
>> that they probably don't here much from those of us who use it |
30 |
>> successfully. |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> What I'm not clear about Volker is whether _you_ are a user of |
33 |
>> Virtualbox and have had problems with recent versions yourself or just |
34 |
>> down on the application because of what you read? |
35 |
>> |
36 |
>> - Mark |
37 |
> |
38 |
> except random crahes here and there and two instances of a virtual machine |
39 |
> deconstructing itself, no, no problems here. |
40 |
> |
41 |
|
42 |
OK, good information, although I'm sorry you had the problems. |
43 |
|
44 |
- Mark |