| 1 |
Am Mittwoch 09 November 2011, 10:22:42 schrieb Mark Knecht: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Am Montag 07 November 2011, 10:28:41 schrieb J. Roeleveld: |
| 6 |
> >> On Sun, November 6, 2011 6:49 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> > Am Samstag 05 November 2011, 20:45:15 schrieb Joost Roeleveld: |
| 8 |
> >> >> Virtualbox has decent USB-pass-through support. Even quite high |
| 9 |
> >> >> performance. |
| 10 |
> >> >> |
| 11 |
> >> >> > Thanks for your help. I do appreciate it |
| 12 |
> >> > |
| 13 |
> >> > virtualbox is also pretty broken at the moment. |
| 14 |
> >> |
| 15 |
> >> Broken in what way? |
| 16 |
> >> I am happily using it without any issues. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > the worst way: |
| 19 |
> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk5Mw |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Yeah, it was sort of fun to watch that thread as it occurred on LKML. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Personally I felt the Phoronix article was a bit of a troll as the |
| 24 |
> best he could do personally was say that he had problems a year ago, |
| 25 |
> but I believe the kernel devs are telling the truth as best they know |
| 26 |
> it about the number of bug reports they get. Let's remember however |
| 27 |
> that they probably don't here much from those of us who use it |
| 28 |
> successfully. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> What I'm not clear about Volker is whether _you_ are a user of |
| 31 |
> Virtualbox and have had problems with recent versions yourself or just |
| 32 |
> down on the application because of what you read? |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> - Mark |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
except random crahes here and there and two instances of a virtual machine |
| 37 |
deconstructing itself, no, no problems here. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
#163933 |
Archives