1 |
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
2 |
<volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> Am Montag 07 November 2011, 10:28:41 schrieb J. Roeleveld: |
4 |
>> On Sun, November 6, 2011 6:49 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
5 |
>> > Am Samstag 05 November 2011, 20:45:15 schrieb Joost Roeleveld: |
6 |
>> >> Virtualbox has decent USB-pass-through support. Even quite high |
7 |
>> >> performance. |
8 |
>> >> |
9 |
>> >> > Thanks for your help. I do appreciate it |
10 |
>> > |
11 |
>> > virtualbox is also pretty broken at the moment. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> Broken in what way? |
14 |
>> I am happily using it without any issues. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> the worst way: |
17 |
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk5Mw |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
Yeah, it was sort of fun to watch that thread as it occurred on LKML. |
21 |
|
22 |
Personally I felt the Phoronix article was a bit of a troll as the |
23 |
best he could do personally was say that he had problems a year ago, |
24 |
but I believe the kernel devs are telling the truth as best they know |
25 |
it about the number of bug reports they get. Let's remember however |
26 |
that they probably don't here much from those of us who use it |
27 |
successfully. |
28 |
|
29 |
What I'm not clear about Volker is whether _you_ are a user of |
30 |
Virtualbox and have had problems with recent versions yourself or just |
31 |
down on the application because of what you read? |
32 |
|
33 |
- Mark |