1 |
> >> What do you mean by "outperform"? I can see how drivers can |
2 |
> >> affect throughput. The Windows drivers for my Laptop's WiFi |
3 |
> >> chipset (Intel Pro-something) only get about 1/4 of the |
4 |
> >> bandwidth that the Linux drivers do. |
5 |
> >> |
6 |
> >> But, I don't understand how the driver can affect receiver |
7 |
> >> sensitivity. That's purely a function of the design of the RF |
8 |
> >> frontend. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > As modified by the firmware in the device. OK, it's not the |
11 |
> > driver per se, but it's certainly not the hardware either |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Sorry, I don't see how firmware can affect sensitivity. I've |
14 |
> been involved in writing firmware for RF data communications |
15 |
> stuff for a long time, and I've certainly never been able to |
16 |
> affect sensitivity. |
17 |
|
18 |
I can say that I was really struggling to get a reliable wireless |
19 |
connection with the rt2x00 device and Hawking external antenna |
20 |
anywhere in my garage. I tried the madwifi device attached to the |
21 |
same Hawking antenna and the difference was ridiculous. I got a |
22 |
perfectly reliable signal from the back of the garage, the point |
23 |
furthest from the signal's source. |
24 |
|
25 |
Now that I think about it, I could have enabled outdoor mode for |
26 |
madwifi, but I can't check it right now. Could that account for the |
27 |
difference? |
28 |
|
29 |
- Grant |
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |