1 |
On 27 Jun 2008, at 10:57, Joerg Schilling wrote: |
2 |
> Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
3 |
>> On 27 Jun 2008, at 10:25, Joerg Schilling wrote: |
4 |
>>> Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>>>> On Thursday 26 June 2008, Joerg Schilling wrote: |
6 |
>>>>> A more general problem is the license incompatibility with |
7 |
>>>>> libcdio. |
8 |
>>>>> Sun dropped libcdio already a year ago after Sun lawyers detected |
9 |
>>>>> the |
10 |
>>>>> problem and I expect that Linux distros will do the same soon. |
11 |
>>>> |
12 |
>>>> Could you elaborate a little on what the license incompatibility |
13 |
>>>> is? |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>> First, libcdio had an illegal license change... |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> Since you now appear to be answering license questions, could I |
18 |
>> trouble you, please, to address this query? |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/200045 |
21 |
> |
22 |
> If you like to have a serious answer, do not include pointers to |
23 |
> nonserious |
24 |
> articles like this one: |
25 |
> |
26 |
> http://lwn.net/Articles/195167/ |
27 |
|
28 |
Sorry, Joerg. |
29 |
|
30 |
I only included that article because it came up when I searched for |
31 |
"cdrecord" license problem. |
32 |
|
33 |
Perhaps you could overlook my ignorance just this once and explain |
34 |
why you chose to migrate your software from the GPL to the CDDL |
35 |
(or to a CDDL-alike license). |
36 |
|
37 |
To a naive reader, with only that article to go on, it does seem to |
38 |
be that action of yours which instigated distros dropping your |
39 |
software for the alternative. I'm sure, as you say, this was |
40 |
unjustified on their part, however some background on your choice |
41 |
might be helpful. |
42 |
|
43 |
Stroller. |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |