1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 22 May 2015 17:04:49 -0500, Dale wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> I also save the config with the same version part as the kernel, that |
5 |
>> way I know which config goes with which kernel. Everyone has their own |
6 |
>> way of doing what works for them. I just prefer to copy my own manually |
7 |
>> with a name that makes sense to me. I don't think make install will do |
8 |
>> this the way I do it. |
9 |
> make install does it exactly the way you are doing it, but faster and |
10 |
> less prone to error. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
Funny, I've yet to screw up copying and naming a kernel. Also, I get to |
16 |
name it the way I want to name it not the way someone else wants to name |
17 |
it. I sort of doubt that make install will repeat the same naming |
18 |
scheme I use. Of course, I haven't tried it in a long time either. It |
19 |
wouldn't do what I wanted the last time I read about it so I never used |
20 |
it. I haven't seen any need to since I don't update my kernels that |
21 |
often. I'm going on two months since my last reboot. |
22 |
|
23 |
Dale |
24 |
|
25 |
:-) :-) |