| 1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:54:44 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>> Last time I looked, qlop did not provide any estimate of time |
| 5 |
>>> remaining. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> That will teach me to take a nap. That's why I use genlop too. I |
| 8 |
>> rarely use any of the q commands. It seems something is always missing |
| 9 |
>> for one reason or the other. I'm sure that varies over time tho. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I do like the q commands, they are fast and generally do what I want. But |
| 12 |
> this one lets the side down a little. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I did try them a while back. They are fast. It sort of reminds me of |
| 18 |
when I logged out of KDE and into Fluxbox. I was waiting on Fluxbox to |
| 19 |
come up when I realized I blinked and missed it. LOL Fluxbox runs |
| 20 |
pretty quick on a 4 core machine. ;-) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Dale |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
:-) :-) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
| 28 |
how you interpreted my words! |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
| 31 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |
Archives