| 1 |
On 08/11/2015 05:09:07 PM, James wrote: |
| 2 |
> Helmut Jarausch <jarausch <at> skynet.be> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > > Just for grins, I'm thinking about installing a gentoo system |
| 6 |
> > > that is (~) testing and newer codes and setting gcc-.5.2 |
| 7 |
> > I don't use lxqt here, but ... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> lxqt is trivial and not critical, so let's just ignore that part. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > I'm using gcc-5.2.0 very successfully here. I am not aware of a |
| 12 |
> single |
| 13 |
> package which doesn't compile with |
| 14 |
> > this version. |
| 15 |
> > And the kernel itself compiles just fine (currentlich running |
| 16 |
> 4.2.0-rc6 |
| 17 |
> compiled with gcc-5.2.0) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> WOW! cool beans..... |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> OK so going this far out on the compiler is new ground for me |
| 22 |
> (but very exciting too.... |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Looking at the portage tree, I doubt you got gcc-5.2.8 there......? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
If I said gcc-5.2.8 that is a typo. |
| 28 |
Even on https://gcc.gnu.org/ |
| 29 |
there is only gcc-5.2.0 currently. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Sorry for the typo, |
| 32 |
Helmut. |
Archives