| 1 |
Bill Kenworthy <billk <at> iinet.net.au> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > Am 19.01.2015 um 09:32 schrieb Bill Kenworthy: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> >> Can someone suggest what is causing a balance on this raid 1 |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Interesting. |
| 9 |
I am about to test (reboot) a btrfs, raid one installation. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Brilliant, you have hit on the answer! - The ancient 300GB system disk |
| 12 |
> was sda at one point and moved to sdb - possibly at the time I changed |
| 13 |
> to using UUID's. Ive just resized all the disks and its now moved past |
| 14 |
> 300G for the first time as well as the other two falling in step with |
| 15 |
> the data moving. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I was wondering what my /etc/fstab should look like using uuids, raid 1 and |
| 18 |
btrfs. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Could you post your /etc/fstab and any other modifications you made to |
| 21 |
your installation related to the btrfs, raid 1 uuid setup? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I'm just using (2) identical 2T disks for my new gentoo workstation. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> I moved to UUID's as the machine has a number of sata ports and a PCI-e |
| 26 |
> sata adaptor and the sd* drive numbering kept moving around when I added |
| 27 |
> the WD red. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Eventually, I want to run CephFS on several of these raid one btrfs |
| 31 |
systems for some clustering code experiments. I'm not sure how that |
| 32 |
will affect, if at all, the raid 1-btrfs-uuid setup. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
TIA, |
| 36 |
James |
Archives