| 1 |
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 11:54 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mick<michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >> On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> >>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick<michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 8 |
> >>> |
| 9 |
> >>>> All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to |
| 10 |
> >>>> emerge and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary. |
| 11 |
> >>>> |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> >>> Is it much worse than OpenOffice? Build times are nearly identical on |
| 14 |
> >>> my system but I haven't paid attention to temp space needed during the |
| 15 |
> >>> emerge process. |
| 16 |
> >>> |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> >> By about +3G may be more! |
| 19 |
> >> |
| 20 |
> > I think this is not so with the new 3.4.x versions... |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> This is so far. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> root@fireball / # du -shc /var/tmp/portage/app-office/ |
| 28 |
> 2.6G /var/tmp/portage/app-office/ |
| 29 |
> 2.6G total |
| 30 |
> root@fireball / |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> It's not done yet either. My /var is at 94% so I am moving some |
| 33 |
> http-rep* stuff out of the way. One of these days, I'm just going to |
| 34 |
> mount it on tmpfs and let it rip. lol |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> Dale |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> :-) :-) |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
For systems without enough space I just map some more with nfs (before |
| 42 |
you start obviously) - yes it is a lot slower, and you need a reliable |
| 43 |
network with nfs over tcp for best reliability but it works fine. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
BillK |
Archives