| 1 |
Matt Connell wrote: |
| 2 |
> How many torrents are you seeding, for a point of comparison? |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I use deluge (headless) on my home server, seeding anywhere from 500- |
| 5 |
> 1000 individual torrents, representing ~5TB of total data, and the |
| 6 |
> process is cruising along at just over 1GB of memory used. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Maybe qbittorrent just doesn't scale well? I feel like I'm on the |
| 9 |
> exceedingly-high end of the spectrum with usage of a torrent program, |
| 10 |
> but I don't know what everyone else is doing. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
At one point, I had about 400 or so total, some downloading, some |
| 16 |
finished and uploading while some were doing both. I may have to switch |
| 17 |
to something else before it is over. I may even put it on a different |
| 18 |
machine or use something else to put my videos on the TV, HTPC thingy. |
| 19 |
Since I've found things that were hard to find elsewhere, I want to |
| 20 |
return the favor. So, I'd really like to hold onto those that are hard |
| 21 |
to find. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
After I removed some of the inactive ones, it is a lot better. I also |
| 24 |
limited the upload speed which helped a lot. According to atop, when |
| 25 |
uploading at higher speeds, the reads were really putting a load on that |
| 26 |
set of drives. Does deluge have a GUI option? Of course, if I put it |
| 27 |
on another machine, I may go headless for it. That's one reason I'm |
| 28 |
asking. Options. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
And as soon as I think it is better, it slows down again and I find this |
| 31 |
from top: |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
27672 dale 20 0 410.7g 4.3g 4.1g S 2.2 13.6 158:26.37 |
| 35 |
/usr/bin/qbittorrent |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
It's not nearly as bad as it was when I started this thread but still, |
| 39 |
that's a lot of memory. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Dale |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
:-) :-) |
Archives