| 1 |
On 9/23/06, Jesper Fruergaard Andersen <gentoo@×××.dk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> looked around but cannot find any information about if or how this can be |
| 3 |
> fixed. Is it possible to fix the superblock or force it in some way. I |
| 4 |
> guess maybe they may be out of sync so the filesystem could be invalid if |
| 5 |
> forced to start anyway. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I *think* this will work. Or it might permanently trash your data. |
| 8 |
Unfortunately I don't have access to any raid arrays to test with atm. |
| 9 |
:-( |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Take a look at one of the good superblocks with mdadm --examine. That |
| 12 |
should give you an idea of what options to give to create. You'll |
| 13 |
want to make sure you use the same layout, chunksize, etc... |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
You should then be able to recreate the array with mdadm --create |
| 16 |
--assume-clean, and get access to your filesystem and data. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Check "man mdadm" for more details... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Good luck. :-( |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-Richard |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives