Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: !!!!
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:55:31
Message-Id: 201508192055.18533.michaelkintzios@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: !!!! by Jeremi Piotrowski
1 On Wednesday 19 Aug 2015 10:28:48 Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
2 > On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, John Campbell wrote:
3 > > On 08/18/2015 06:38 PM, walt wrote:
4 > > > On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:03:31 -0700
5 > > >
6 > > > John Campbell <jdc.rpv@×××.net> wrote:
7 > > > > I haven't really been following this closely but I haven't seen any
8 > > > > suggestion to use "emerge -1 --quiet=y smart-live-rebuild" to remove
9 > > > > the offending curses output. Hopefully emerge doesn't check/use
10 > > > > curses unless it's producing actual output.
11 >
12 > From the initial post it seems that the binary that has a problem is
13 > bash/sh. They are both linked against tinfo/ncurses. And since portage
14 > runs using bash... you see where I'm going with this. You could maybe use
15 > a different shell (although I can't imagine a shell not using the terminal
16 > capabilities ;) ), but still wouldn't be able to use portage.
17 >
18 > > Maybe "emerge --quiet=y -a @smart-live-rebuild"
19 >
20 > Smart live rebuild only deals with live ebuilds. How would it help in this
21 > case?
22
23 Anyone cares to explain what is a "live ebuild"?
24
25 Then I may be able to understand what @smart-live-rebuild may be useful for.
26 :-/
27
28 --
29 Regards,
30 Mick

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: !!!! Alec Ten Harmsel <alec@××××××××××××××.com>