1 |
On Wednesday 19 Aug 2015 10:28:48 Jeremi Piotrowski wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, John Campbell wrote: |
3 |
> > On 08/18/2015 06:38 PM, walt wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:03:31 -0700 |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > John Campbell <jdc.rpv@×××.net> wrote: |
7 |
> > > > I haven't really been following this closely but I haven't seen any |
8 |
> > > > suggestion to use "emerge -1 --quiet=y smart-live-rebuild" to remove |
9 |
> > > > the offending curses output. Hopefully emerge doesn't check/use |
10 |
> > > > curses unless it's producing actual output. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> From the initial post it seems that the binary that has a problem is |
13 |
> bash/sh. They are both linked against tinfo/ncurses. And since portage |
14 |
> runs using bash... you see where I'm going with this. You could maybe use |
15 |
> a different shell (although I can't imagine a shell not using the terminal |
16 |
> capabilities ;) ), but still wouldn't be able to use portage. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> > Maybe "emerge --quiet=y -a @smart-live-rebuild" |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Smart live rebuild only deals with live ebuilds. How would it help in this |
21 |
> case? |
22 |
|
23 |
Anyone cares to explain what is a "live ebuild"? |
24 |
|
25 |
Then I may be able to understand what @smart-live-rebuild may be useful for. |
26 |
:-/ |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Regards, |
30 |
Mick |