1 |
> -----Original Message----- |
2 |
> From: Aggelos [mailto:marmango@××××××××.gr] |
3 |
> Sent: 22 February 2007 18:20 |
4 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
5 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] off topic : Dolphin massacre in Japan |
6 |
> |
7 |
> |
8 |
> on 02/21/2007 07:48 PM Aggelos wrote the following: |
9 |
> > www.glumbert.com/media/dolphin |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > www.petitiononline.com/golfinho |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I really don't care if consider the above as spam or not or |
14 |
> watever, for |
15 |
> this list or for any list. I am subscribed to this list so I posted it |
16 |
> here. If I had posted it to a dolphins related list there would be no |
17 |
> gain as they should most probably be aware of it. So if you don't have |
18 |
> any good suggestions for the "OT", just let those that may show some |
19 |
> interest for them, to just see what it's about. You don't |
20 |
> have to bother |
21 |
> the list with those "smart ass" comments about OT posts. |
22 |
> My OT post would be one and only one, but you just made it a thread. |
23 |
> -- |
24 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
I don't see a problem with OT posts that have some vague relevance e.g: List policies, Linux security issues (for example " OT - Some miscellanous questions about hack attacks and dealing with them"). By your logic people could discuss *anything* on this list with the defense of "Some people might want to see it...". There has to be some sort of line drawn really, and I can't speak for anyone else but that line stops at the edge of computer-related discussion in my mind. |
29 |
|
30 |
Anyway, it's 6.30pm and I'm finished beating this dead dol... horse so I'm going home. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
djn |
34 |
|
35 |
I do not represent anyone else in emails I send to this list. |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |