| 1 |
On 2011-09-18 14:56, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> And he's using Audacious - a fork of a gigantic bug nest (mms) . |
| 4 |
> According to his earlier post, it forces dbus to run. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Xmms, I believe it's called. And it's been working fine for quite a |
| 7 |
while (I've actually have never encountered a bug with Audacious), for |
| 8 |
me. Now, when I upgraded to 2.4.x dbus was forced on me (well, that and |
| 9 |
Xfce4)... I'm used to Audacious because I like the simple interface |
| 10 |
(non-gtk+). But if you have another player you would like to recommend |
| 11 |
I'll gladly try it. Requirements: no gconf/gnome/udev/udisk(etc.) |
| 12 |
dependency (only sane dependencies like libogg/flac etc., possibly gtk |
| 13 |
or qt for ui but nothing else), simple UI (like Audacious legacy mode), |
| 14 |
no singin' and dancing crap (simplicity over "features")... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Now, that can hardly be dbus's fault if some other app has a hardcoded |
| 17 |
> RUNTIME dep on dbus. The fault lies entirely with Audacious, not with |
| 18 |
> dbus. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I fully agree to that last sentiment, which is why I'm whining... I |
| 21 |
thought that was what we were doing here? ;-) |
| 22 |
But to be fair, it's actually Xfce4 that starts dbus-daemon/launch (I |
| 23 |
haven't started Audacious yet and I always turn off my computer when not |
| 24 |
in use). |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Best regards |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Peter K |
Archives