Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Safe to install libpng-1.2.44? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 03 Jul 2010 00:14:27 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20100703011316.0f7ddc0d@zaphod.digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Safe to install libpng-1.2.44? by Dale |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 17:49:30 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > This appears to be the opposite of a upgrade. He has a package that |
| 4 | > wants the OLD slotted version of libpng not the NEW slotted version. |
| 5 | > If I understand that correctly, he has already done the upgrade but now |
| 6 | > something needs the old package installed in addition to the new one. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | The joys of running binary software... |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Neil Bothwick |
| 13 | |
| 14 | A seminar on time travel will be held 2 weeks ago. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-user] Re: Safe to install libpng-1.2.44? | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> |