1 |
Shawn Haggett wrote: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 18 February 2009 16:24:45 Paul Hartman wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Beau Henderson <beau@××××××××××××.com> |
5 |
>> |
6 |
> wrote: |
7 |
> |
8 |
>>> G'day, |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> I was wondering if anyone might have any idea's as to what is causing my |
11 |
>>> new Toshiba A300 Satelite to idle at a load of 1.00 when not in use. |
12 |
>>> Right after boot up it settles at 1.00 when I do nothing. I'm not seeing |
13 |
>>> anything out of ordinary in dmesg ( asside from an non issue with legacy |
14 |
>>> usb and sd and sr drivers in the kernel ). |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> I had Ubuntu on this thing for a week or so as I needed something quick |
17 |
>>> fast when my workstation chipfan died on me and this wasn't an issue when |
18 |
>>> I had that installed so I think I can rule out hardware. Also, its not an |
19 |
>>> issue when I boot up via live cd ( sysrescuecd ). |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>>> I've tried different cpufreq governors ( default is ondemand ) and that |
22 |
>>> doesn't appear to be an issue. |
23 |
>>> |
24 |
>>> Any help or suggestions would be appreciated. |
25 |
>>> |
26 |
>>> Thanks. |
27 |
>>> |
28 |
>> I've never known what those numbers represent (I know it is "load |
29 |
>> average", but what it means, and what is the range, I have no idea)... |
30 |
>> Anyway, it seems mine are always around 1+. It's not perfectly idle |
31 |
>> but not running seti or anything intensive either. |
32 |
>> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> I remember trying to google the meaning of those numbers once. It was VERY |
35 |
> hard to find out what they were. It's something like, average number of |
36 |
> processes in the running or ready to run states for the last 1, 5 & 15 |
37 |
> minutes. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Shawn |
40 |
> |
41 |
> |
42 |
googling "load average" brings me to |
43 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Load_(computing) which explains it somewhat. |
44 |
|
45 |
HTH |
46 |
|
47 |
Matt |