| 1 |
Am Samstag, 7. Januar 2012, 13:27:04 schrieb Jeff Cranmer: |
| 2 |
> > > I tried changing the type of each array element in fdisk to fd (linux |
| 3 |
> > > raid autodetect. |
| 4 |
> > > |
| 5 |
> > > The array is still not being recognised at boot, with the same 'cannot |
| 6 |
> > > read superblock' error. |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > I also tried re-running mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=5 |
| 9 |
> > > --raid-devices=3 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 |
| 10 |
> > > I get the error |
| 11 |
> > > mdadm: device /dev/sdb1 not suitable for any style of array. |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > What is going on here? |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > I am thinking ;) |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> LOL! |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Me too. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> mdadm --detail /dev/md0 thinks that /dev/sdc1 is faulty. |
| 22 |
> I'm not sure whether it's really faulty, or just that my setup for RAID |
| 23 |
> is screwed up. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> How do I get rid of an existing /dev/md0? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
you stop it. Override the superblock with dd.. and lose all data on the disks. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> I'm thinking that I can try creating a RAID1 array using the two |
| 32 |
> allegedly good disks and see if I can make that work. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
yeah |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> If that works, I'll get rid of it and try recreating the RAID1 with one |
| 38 |
> good disk and the one that mdadm thinks is faulty. |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
you don't have to. You can migrate a 2 disk raid1 to a 3 disk raid5. Howtos |
| 42 |
are availble via google. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
just saying - box in suspend to ram. I change the cable (and connector on |
| 46 |
mobo) on a disk with two raid 1 partitions on it. |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
One came back after starting the box. |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
The other? Nothing I tried worked. At the end I dd'ed the partition.. and did |
| 51 |
a complete 'faulty disk/replacement' resync.... |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
argl. |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
-- |
| 57 |
#163933 |
Archives