| 1 |
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Michael Mol wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >> In fact, I like gentoo and FreeBSD best for low-spoec hardware. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > What does low-spec hardware mean? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Whatever the default setup of the latest release of Ubuntu runs |
| 10 |
> sluggish on. (Or what a previous version of Ubuntu ran on, but current |
| 11 |
> versions won't) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> While somewhat flippant, that seems a pretty reasonable way to think about it. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Seems to me Ubuntu is sluggish no matter what hardware you have. |
| 17 |
Peopple pay such a high price to avoid learning anything... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
But I was thinking more about anything x86 or ppc and single core, |
| 20 |
or stuff like intel atom. Anything ARM. Anything pre core2duo from |
| 21 |
intel, for sure, as well as any ppc Mac. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
caveat utilitor |
| 25 |
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ |
Archives