| 1 |
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Michael Mol wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> > |
| 6 |
>> >> In fact, I like gentoo and FreeBSD best for low-spoec hardware. |
| 7 |
>> > |
| 8 |
>> > What does low-spec hardware mean? |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Whatever the default setup of the latest release of Ubuntu runs |
| 11 |
>> sluggish on. (Or what a previous version of Ubuntu ran on, but current |
| 12 |
>> versions won't) |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> While somewhat flippant, that seems a pretty reasonable way to think about it. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Seems to me Ubuntu is sluggish no matter what hardware you have. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
That's why I gave the description I did. What seems sluggish to you |
| 20 |
may not seem sluggish to me. It certainly won't seem sluggish to my |
| 21 |
grandmother... |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
It tunes itself very nicely to the perceptions and needs of the |
| 24 |
individual in question. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
:wq |
Archives