| 1 |
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: |
| 2 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb: |
| 3 |
> > On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/baselayout/base |
| 5 |
> >>lay out-2.0.0.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3 |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > oh great, changes without a rX bump. I hate that. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> No need for a rev bump here i guess! Anybody who runs into this will not |
| 10 |
> benefit from a rev bump, as the files were gone and are not restored by |
| 11 |
> the bump. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
yes, need for a rev bump. If one person has a problem and another person does |
| 14 |
not have the problem, it is helpfull to be able to determine the exact |
| 15 |
version of the packet installed. Not bumping revs makes that harder. |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives