| 1 |
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:42:37AM -0600, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s wrote |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> No, because the problem has never been in udev (nor systemd, for that |
| 5 |
>> matter). It fixes how *Gentoo* packages udev; probably the devs read |
| 6 |
>> the following comment from Lennart (note it was written almost a month |
| 7 |
>> ago): |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/115547683951727699051/posts/jcCjMct3SJ3 |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The systemd defenders are using "separate /usr" as a "wookie defense" |
| 12 |
> in an attempt to divert attention form the main issue. Separate /usr |
| 13 |
> is actually a secondary issue. The main issue is whether or not we get |
| 14 |
> systemd rammed down our throats. Lennart and Kay are the people |
| 15 |
> responsible for scaring others into mdev and/or eudev. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Ubuntu wants systemd even less than Gentoo. I will not be surprised if |
| 18 |
Gentoo makes systemd the recommended default before Ubuntu. And yet, |
| 19 |
Ubuntu doesn't want to fork udev, and actually a Canonical employee |
| 20 |
has git access to the udev/systemd tree. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Regards. |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 25 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
| 26 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
Archives