1 |
On Jan 6, 2012 8:44 PM, "Stroller" <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On 4 January 2012, at 18:19, Tamer Higazi wrote: |
5 |
> > … |
6 |
> > I want to make my linux machine being a wlan access point for my other |
7 |
> > components like Notebook, Cell phone etc... |
8 |
> |
9 |
> If you just want to temporarily share then I think "access point" is |
10 |
unimportant - can't you use "ad hoc" mode? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> "Access point" means getting a wifi card which supports master mode. Not |
13 |
all do. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I question whether this is worth the bother - routers are just too cheap. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> If you want to do something complicated, which is not available in the |
18 |
menus of your $20 wifi router, then run OpenWRT Linux on a $40 router. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> The extra cost of a recent router will quickly pay for itself in |
21 |
electricity savings, over leaving your big desktop PC on when you only want |
22 |
to surf the net on your netbook. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Stroller. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
I agree. But I strongly recommend going the OpenWRT route directly. |
29 |
|
30 |
Proprietary access points, especially the ones supporting WPS, are security |
31 |
threats : |
32 |
|
33 |
http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2012/01/hands-on-hacking-wifi-protected-setup-with-reaver.ars |
34 |
|
35 |
the WPS protocol has been broken. OpenWRT does not support WPS, so it |
36 |
doesn't have the WPS vulnerability. |
37 |
|
38 |
Rgds, |