Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] requirements for a gentoo wlan accesspoint
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:45:03
Message-Id: CAA2qdGX8fhh0bAPff9LgyGPbJzMB4C_4Sqdjq4+-xOLKsums9w@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] requirements for a gentoo wlan accesspoint by Stroller
1 On Jan 6, 2012 8:44 PM, "Stroller" <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
2 >
3 >
4 > On 4 January 2012, at 18:19, Tamer Higazi wrote:
5 > > …
6 > > I want to make my linux machine being a wlan access point for my other
7 > > components like Notebook, Cell phone etc...
8 >
9 > If you just want to temporarily share then I think "access point" is
10 unimportant - can't you use "ad hoc" mode?
11 >
12 > "Access point" means getting a wifi card which supports master mode. Not
13 all do.
14 >
15 > I question whether this is worth the bother - routers are just too cheap.
16 >
17 > If you want to do something complicated, which is not available in the
18 menus of your $20 wifi router, then run OpenWRT Linux on a $40 router.
19 >
20 > The extra cost of a recent router will quickly pay for itself in
21 electricity savings, over leaving your big desktop PC on when you only want
22 to surf the net on your netbook.
23 >
24 > Stroller.
25 >
26 >
27
28 I agree. But I strongly recommend going the OpenWRT route directly.
29
30 Proprietary access points, especially the ones supporting WPS, are security
31 threats :
32
33 http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2012/01/hands-on-hacking-wifi-protected-setup-with-reaver.ars
34
35 the WPS protocol has been broken. OpenWRT does not support WPS, so it
36 doesn't have the WPS vulnerability.
37
38 Rgds,