| 1 |
On 11/07/2016 20:13, Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 11 Jul 2016 17:31:29 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 11/07/2016 10:32, Emanuele Rusconi wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Wouldn't it be better to just use the same servers for both wired and |
| 5 |
>>> wireless? It's what I use and it works flawlessly. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> It works flawlessly *for you*, but by no means can you consider it |
| 8 |
>> correct or stable. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> There is no guarantee that a wired and wireless network will use the |
| 11 |
>> same dns caches. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Yep, furthermore this is a laptop which is taken around the place and plugged |
| 14 |
> in and out of wired and wireless networks. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
>> If it happens to work, great, use it. But be aware there will come a day |
| 18 |
>> when that is no longer true. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> When I get a minute I'll have a look at net-dns/openresolv which Fernando |
| 21 |
> suggested. I think it will do what want. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
why don't you go with the dns server addresses supplied by each |
| 25 |
network's dhcp? Presumably the admin put them their because they work on |
| 26 |
that network. |
Archives