| 1 |
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Paul Hartman |
| 2 |
<paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>>>> I guess you mean https://panopticlick.eff.org/ |
| 5 |
>>>>> |
| 6 |
>>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> My results from work: |
| 8 |
>>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 1,939,102 tested so far. |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
>>>> Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that |
| 12 |
>>>> conveys at least 20.89 bits of identifying information. |
| 13 |
>>>> |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>>> Funny, I get exactly the same thing except add one to the large number. |
| 17 |
>>> I guess you tested before I did. How does one avoid this but still |
| 18 |
>>> have sites work? |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> Well, I just went to the same site using a Chrome 'incognito' browser, |
| 21 |
>> and got this: |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> Within our dataset of several million visitors, only one in 969,560 |
| 24 |
>> browsers have the same fingerprint as yours. |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>> Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that |
| 27 |
>> conveys 19.89 bits of identifying information. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Within our dataset of visitors, one in 0 browsers have the same |
| 30 |
> fingerprint as yours. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that |
| 33 |
> conveys INF bits of identifying information. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> I think I broke it. I win? :) |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Who knows? You may have only broken you way of seeing the results. ^^ |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
:wq |
Archives