| 1 |
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>> I guess you mean https://panopticlick.eff.org/ |
| 3 |
>>>> |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
>>> My results from work: |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 1,939,102 tested so far. |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that |
| 10 |
>>> conveys at least 20.89 bits of identifying information. |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> Funny, I get exactly the same thing except add one to the large number. |
| 15 |
>> I guess you tested before I did. How does one avoid this but still |
| 16 |
>> have sites work? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Well, I just went to the same site using a Chrome 'incognito' browser, |
| 19 |
> and got this: |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Within our dataset of several million visitors, only one in 969,560 |
| 22 |
> browsers have the same fingerprint as yours. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that |
| 25 |
> conveys 19.89 bits of identifying information. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Within our dataset of visitors, one in 0 browsers have the same |
| 28 |
fingerprint as yours. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that |
| 31 |
conveys INF bits of identifying information. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
I think I broke it. I win? :) |
Archives