1 |
On 2017-05-21 17:59, tuxic@××××××.de wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> cryptsetup seems to be of another flavor than encfs, since its depends |
4 |
> on gpg (see below), which encfs does not use as far as I know. |
5 |
> I think encfs uses symmetric ciphers and cryptsetup uses a pub/private |
6 |
> key pair. But I am by no means a cryptologist (I even cant spell this |
7 |
> correctly...or...? ;) |
8 |
|
9 |
The binary may link to gpg, and the package may depend on it (I haven't |
10 |
checked), but the way I use it is definitely symmetric cryptography. I |
11 |
know enough to be sure of that. |
12 |
|
13 |
-- |
14 |
Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups |
15 |
Personal signed mail: please _encrypt_ and sign |
16 |
Don't clear-text sign: |
17 |
http://primate.net/~itz/blog/the-problem-with-gpg-signatures.html |