Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Roger Mason <rmason@×××××××.ca>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] nfs server problem
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 22:17:57
Message-Id: y65zlyzanji.fsf@minnie.esd.mun.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] nfs server problem by Dan Farrell
1 Hi Dan,
2
3 Dan Farrell <dan@×××××××××.cx> writes:
4
5 > On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 08:54:30 -0230
6 > Roger Mason <rmason@×××××××.ca> wrote:
7 >
8 >> Hello,
9 >>
10 >> I installed a vanilla 2.6.20 kernel in order to (eventually) run
11 >> kerrighed. The kernel boots fine but the nfs server won't start and I
12 >> see this in the logs:
13 >>
14 >> Oct 3 07:34:40 lowalbite rpc.statd[103835]: Version 1.1.0 Starting
15 >> Oct 3 07:34:41 lowalbite nfsd: last server has exited
16 >> Oct 3 07:34:41 lowalbite nfsd: unexporting all filesystems
17 >> Oct 3 07:34:41 lowalbite nfsd[103901]: nfssvc: Address already in use
18 >>
19
20 > It seems like there's two options: either you're trying to run 2 nfs
21 > servers, or you're trying to run nfs threads that for some reason
22 > conflict with each other.
23 >
24 > anyway, the solution I suggest is checking the output of 'netstat -l -p
25 > -n' to see whether anything really is listening on those ports. If
26 > not, try using a quick script to keep reading the output of the
27 > previous netstat command and checking consistantly to see whether
28 > anything's listening on those ports while you restart nfs.
29 > --
30
31 That is agood idea -- I'll try it tomorrow. In the meantime I am
32 working round it by setting the port(s) in /etc/conf.d/nfs, but it
33 would certainly be cleaner to find and eliminated the conflict.
34
35 Thanks for your help.
36
37 Roger
38
39 --
40 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] nfs server problem Hex Star <hexstar@×××××.com>