1 |
Hello, Alan. |
2 |
|
3 |
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:49:37PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
4 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 20:32 on Monday 06 June 2011, Alan Mackenzie |
5 |
> did opine thusly: |
6 |
|
7 |
> > Hi, Gentoo. |
8 |
|
9 |
> > Just to say I'll be withdrawing from this list in a few days, |
10 |
> > unsubscribing actually, mainly so that I can go back to being an Emacs |
11 |
> > developer; the number of emails on both lists combined is just more than |
12 |
> > I can handle comfortably. |
13 |
|
14 |
> > I've counted 28 questions I've asked since late 2009, and every single |
15 |
> > one of them bar two got good answers too. One of those two I answered |
16 |
> > myself just after posting the email ;-), and the other is currently a |
17 |
> > bug report. |
18 |
|
19 |
> > I'd like to say THANK YOU to everybody who helped me get a well running |
20 |
> > Gentoo system and patiently taught me about it, but in particular to |
21 |
> > Alan McKinnon because he's got such a splendid name. |
22 |
|
23 |
> Aw shucks, now you made me blush :-) |
24 |
|
25 |
Hah! |
26 |
|
27 |
> I know what you mean about the quality of user around here - no other list I'm |
28 |
> on anywhere else comes close. I know I whinge a lot about the many wonderful |
29 |
> ways Gentoo can break, but I keep coming back. |
30 |
|
31 |
It is only the dissatisfied who advance the state of the art. |
32 |
|
33 |
> Part of it is the ease of changing things around and trying new |
34 |
> versions, but mostly it's because of the folks here. |
35 |
|
36 |
Yes, I understand. |
37 |
|
38 |
> -- |
39 |
> alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). |