| 1 |
Neil Bothwick <neil <at> digimed.co.uk> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > I still want to ensure I have no 32 bit packages on this system. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Why? What is special about 32 bit libraries? They are dependencies like |
| 7 |
> any other, if a package needs them why try to stop portage installing |
| 8 |
> them? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Experimentation. I trying to only use 64 bit for minimalistic systems |
| 11 |
development for both embedded and larger linux systems. The idea it to |
| 12 |
be able to aggregate a variety of 64 bit only systems into clusters. Not |
| 13 |
really worth going into in depth. Of the 33 packages that recompiled with |
| 14 |
32 bit requirements, none are critical to the cluster development work, |
| 15 |
so I'll just move that work onto a more appropriate system(s). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
thx, |
| 19 |
James |
Archives