| 1 |
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 05:54:33 -0500, Philip Webb wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Portage knows that what is proposed is going to break the user's system, |
| 4 |
> so it should refuse to do it. It's like "Package A blocks package B", |
| 5 |
> which causes the emerge to stop till the user acts more sensibly. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
This is different in that the problem is not detected until the emerge |
| 8 |
starts, but portage could skip this package and carry on with the rest, |
| 9 |
issuing an elog message explaining what happened and how to force an |
| 10 |
install if that's what you really want. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I cna ytpe 300 wrods pre mniuet!!! |
Archives