Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Safe to install libpng-1.2.44?
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 11:51:57
Message-Id: 4C2F2450.4080109@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Safe to install libpng-1.2.44? by Graham Murray
1 Graham Murray wrote:
2 > Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> writes:
3 >
4 >
5 >> This appears to be the opposite of a upgrade. He has a package that
6 >> wants the OLD slotted version of libpng not the NEW slotted version.
7 >> If I understand that correctly, he has already done the upgrade but
8 >> now something needs the old package installed in addition to the new
9 >> one.
10 >>
11 > As it happens the issue was moot for me, but I am sure that some people
12 > were caught out. I said 'No' to the 'emerge -auDvN @world' and
13 > waited. Later I saw a new bugzilla entry
14 > (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326583) about unneeded opera
15 > dependency on libpng. So I waited until after the fix was announced and
16 > in the tree and resynced, and it no longer wanted to install
17 > libpng-1.2.44.
18 >
19 >
20
21 That works too. Should also be better in the long run. Whew, glad that
22 is over. Nothing worse than having to go through a nasty upgrade just
23 to have to do it again later. ;-)
24
25 Dale
26
27 :-) :-)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Safe to install libpng-1.2.44? Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de>