| 1 |
On 4/25/21 11:39 AM, karl@××××××××.se wrote: |
| 2 |
> I doubt that many are fluen in cu and uucp, |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I think that lack of knowledge / dumb / ignorant about something is (or |
| 5 |
can be) a relatively easy problem to solve. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
As in there is (or was) no knowledge about something and there will be |
| 8 |
(or is) knowledge at some point in the future. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> are they even available on the ms-win side. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I used Taylor-UUCP (no known relation) on Windows XP a number of years |
| 13 |
ago via Cygwin. I suspect that Windows Subsystem for Linux could be |
| 14 |
pressed into service for similar today. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Who knows, this might work https://www.uupc.net/ |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Probably. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> You can always build yourself two pairs of RS232 to RS422 converters |
| 21 |
> and see where the limit on your serial ports are. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
What would the RS232 to RS422 get you? Why not just use RS232 between |
| 24 |
the computers? What does RS422 provide to make the extra conversions |
| 25 |
worth while? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> You can even try with other deserializes/serializers. What speed do |
| 28 |
> you want ? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Probably. I would be afraid that they would have a lower RoI, |
| 31 |
particularly on the effort front. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Grant. . . . |
| 37 |
unix || die |
Archives