| 1 |
James wrote: |
| 2 |
> Joseph <syscon780 <at> gmail.com> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Thank you for the information. |
| 5 |
>> I'll continue on Monday and let you know. If it will not boot with sector |
| 6 |
> starting at 2048, I will |
| 7 |
>> re-partition /boot sda1 to start at 63. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Take some time to research and reflect on your needs (desires?) |
| 10 |
> about which file system to use. (ext 2,4) is always popular and safe. |
| 11 |
> Some are very happy with BTRFS and there are many other interesting |
| 12 |
> choices (ZFS, XFS, etc etc)...... |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> There is no best solution; but the EXT family offers tried and proven |
| 15 |
> options. YMMV. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> hth, |
| 19 |
> James |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I'm not sure if it is ZFS or XFS but I seem to recall one of those does |
| 23 |
not like sudden shutdowns, such as a power failure. Maybe that has |
| 24 |
changed since I last tried whichever one it is that has that issue. If |
| 25 |
you have a UPS tho, shouldn't be so much of a problem, unless your power |
| 26 |
supply goes out. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Just a little heads up in case it matters. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Oh, I use ext2 for /boot and ext4 for everything else, some of that on |
| 31 |
top of LVM. I switched from reiserfs a good while back, bit rot. So |
| 32 |
far, I been really pleased with ext4. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Dale |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
:-) :-) |
Archives