1 |
On 2012-06-22 11:00 AM, Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Tanstaafl<tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
>> Also, my questions was more just to which cards are considered best/most |
4 |
>> stable - SD or CF... |
5 |
|
6 |
> Ultimately they both probably have the same flash chips inside of them |
7 |
> so if your main concern is reliability, I don't think it matters. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> If your concern is performance, CF seems to be used in more |
10 |
> "professional" applications and more high-speed CF cards are readily |
11 |
> available. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> In either case I would suggest avoiding the cheap no-name brands. |
14 |
> Sandisk Extreme Pro is likely the fastest card you can buy (of either |
15 |
> CF or SD form factor), it is available up to 100MB/sec write speeds, |
16 |
> but of course your card reader/host needs to support speeds like that. |
17 |
> Sandisk also routinely has more than 10x the random I/O performance of |
18 |
> most of the other brands which is important when using it on a |
19 |
> computer and not in a linear recording device (photos/video). |
20 |
|
21 |
Thanks Paul, that's all pretty much what I'd concluded as well from my |
22 |
research... |
23 |
|
24 |
I went with the 4GB SanDisk Ultra though (30MB/s), since these will only |
25 |
be used to boot the VMWare hypervisor (which runs fully in RAM once it |
26 |
is booted)... |
27 |
|
28 |
Now I'm looking forward to seeing them in action this weekend... :) |