Archives
Archives
| From: | forgottenwizard <phrexianreaper@××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Am I wrong?.. | ||
| Date: | Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:46:51 | ||
| Message-Id: | de86f2cfff478fbadf35d4ccd3aa5666@smtp.hushmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Am I wrong?.. by James Ausmus |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 12:04:38PM -0700, James Ausmus wrote: |
| 2 | > 2009/10/1 Arthur D. <spinal.by@××××.ru> |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > The Gentoo Way of doing things is to stick as close to "vanilla" upstream as |
| 5 | > possible, and to enable you to have complete control over your box, |
| 6 | > including configurations. In other words, if you want something configured |
| 7 | > differently than vanilla, you have to do the work. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | |
| 10 | How many packages actually follow upstream without patching the source? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Am I wrong?.. | Neal Hogan <nealhogan@×××××.com> |