1 |
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:36:15 +0800 Mark David Dumlao wrote: |
2 |
[...] |
3 |
> > So, please, don't take it as an insult. In fact you have done a very good |
4 |
> > job of patiently spelling out the advantages of systemd, to the point I'm no |
5 |
> > longer afraid of it taking over and devouring the linux world. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> If systemd truly is, as you say "taking over and devouring the linux world" |
8 |
> such that the majority of distro maintainers are individually choosing |
9 |
> to use a feature or two from it, then yes, it definitely is the job of people |
10 |
> who want to opt out of it to do the work. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> If Gnome wants systemd, and you don't, but you want to continue using |
13 |
> Gnome, it's _your_ job to look for a method or patch or package or script |
14 |
> that makes it work. |
15 |
|
16 |
1. I do _not_ want to use Gnome (and never used it) as DE. |
17 |
2. Someone called Lennart was a long-time Gnome contributor before |
18 |
Gnome required systemd without alternative. Coincidence? I don't |
19 |
believe in them. I trust probabilities and statistics. |
20 |
|
21 |
> If udev wants systemd, and you don't, but you want to continue using |
22 |
> udev, it's _your_ job to look for a method or patch or package or script |
23 |
> that makes it work. |
24 |
|
25 |
We have eudev fork which is clean from systemd crapware and works |
26 |
perfectly on production setutps. |
27 |
|
28 |
> If foo wants systemd, and you don't, but you want to continue using |
29 |
> foo, it's _your_ job to look for a method or patch or package or script |
30 |
> that makes it work. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> If everybody else wants to use systemd but you, it's your job to keep |
33 |
> your system working the way you want to. |
34 |
|
35 |
Nobody else requires systemd mandatory now as to my knowledge. |
36 |
|
37 |
> Nobody's going to go out of their way to specifically and targettedly break |
38 |
> your system, because you don't like their way. However, you can co-opt |
39 |
> some package maintainer's way and say he's obligated to make a |
40 |
> "pure" and "systemd uncorrupted" system for you. Because he's not. |
41 |
> |
42 |
> > Bottom line: since Gentoo's default and primary init system is (and |
43 |
> > hopefully will be for a very long time) OpenRC, it is on the systemd folks |
44 |
> > to do the work to get systemd fully supported. |
45 |
> > |
46 |
> |
47 |
> systemd IS supported and working. The problem arises when there are |
48 |
> people that want to push for a "system with no systemd whatsoever" |
49 |
> and act like it's the systemd maintainer's job to make that happen. |
50 |
|
51 |
OpenRC is default in Gentoo now, and it is my best hope it will be. |
52 |
Thus anyone willing to use something else should do an appropriate |
53 |
job. |
54 |
|
55 |
Best regards, |
56 |
Andrew Savchenko |