1 |
On Monday, August 15, 2022 12:44:11 AM CEST Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Howdy, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> With my new fiber internet, my poor disks are getting a work out, and |
5 |
> also filling up. First casualty, my backup disk. I have one directory |
6 |
> that is . . . well . . . huge. It's about 7TBs or so. This is where it |
7 |
> is right now and it's still trying to pack in files. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> /dev/mapper/8tb 7.3T 7.1T 201G 98% /mnt/8tb |
10 |
|
11 |
<snipped> |
12 |
|
13 |
> Thoughts? Ideas? |
14 |
|
15 |
Plenty, see below: |
16 |
|
17 |
For backups to external disks, I would recommend having a look at "dar" : |
18 |
$ eix -e dar |
19 |
* app-backup/dar |
20 |
Available versions: 2.7.6^t ~2.7.7^t {argon2 curl dar32 dar64 doc gcrypt |
21 |
gpg lz4 lzo nls rsync threads xattr} |
22 |
Homepage: http://dar.linux.free.fr/ |
23 |
Description: A full featured backup tool, aimed for disks |
24 |
|
25 |
It's been around for a while and the developer is active and responds quite |
26 |
well to questions. |
27 |
It supports compression (different compression methods), incremental backups |
28 |
(only need a catalogue of the previous backup for the incremental) and |
29 |
encryption. |
30 |
|
31 |
The NAS options others mentioned would also work as they can compress data on |
32 |
disk and you'd only notice a delay in writing/reading (depending on the |
33 |
compression method used). I would recommend using one that uses ZFS on-disk as |
34 |
it's more reliable and robust then BTRFS. |
35 |
|
36 |
One option that comes available for you now that you are no longer limited to |
37 |
slow ADSL: Cloud backups. |
38 |
|
39 |
I use Backblaze (B2) to store compressed backups that haven't been stored on |
40 |
tape to off-site locations. |
41 |
|
42 |
But, you can also encrypt the backups locally and store the |
43 |
encrypted+compressed backupfiles on other cloud storage. |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
Joost |