| 1 |
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 11:52:26 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > but the issue here was eudev *not* being updated when the virtual |
| 4 |
> > was, and both cause and result were quite clear. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Right, but I was talking about not updating *anything* related to any |
| 7 |
> mission critical apps, and that would include the virtual/udev as well. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> That said - shouldn't this be taken care of by the the virtual/udev |
| 10 |
> package itself? Shoudln't it keep track of what versions of udev *and* |
| 11 |
> eudev it supports, and warn you (via a [B]blocker)? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
There was a blocker (small b) because virtual/udev needed sys-fs/udev and |
| 14 |
that gave a blocker that uninstalled eudev. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The present never ages. Each moment is like a snowflake, unique, |
| 21 |
unspoiled, unrepeatable, and can be appreciated in its surprisingness. |
Archives