| 1 |
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
| 2 |
<volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Am Sonntag, 17. Juni 2012, 11:52:48 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: |
| 4 |
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> > So, while we're meta-discussing Linus' rant on Gnome3, here's an article |
| 6 |
>> > from TechRadar exploring the usability of the leading Linux desktop |
| 7 |
>> > environments. |
| 8 |
>> > |
| 9 |
>> > http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/whats-the-best-li |
| 10 |
>> > nux-desktop-environment-1045280 |
| 11 |
>> > |
| 12 |
>> > Summary: Try the latest KDE. You might get pleasantly surprised. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> In my humble opinion, you should use whatever you actually like. You |
| 15 |
>> don't like GNOME? Then don't use it; and if you used it before and |
| 16 |
>> don't like the new version, either get involver to get it "fixed" (for |
| 17 |
>> whatever defintion of "fixed" you want), fork it (although maybe you |
| 18 |
>> should first try Unity, MATE, or Cinnamon before), or go to another |
| 19 |
>> desktop. |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> I like GNOME 3, therefore I use it. I like systemd, therefore I use |
| 22 |
>> it. I like Emacs, therefore I use it. If someone else wants to use |
| 23 |
>> KDE, OpenRC, and Vim, it's none of my business. To each his own. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> one question - how can you call something that doesn't even let you change the |
| 26 |
> fonts call a 'desktop environment'? |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> -- |
| 29 |
> #163933 |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Ignoring the fact that I *can* change the font, why should I have to? |
| 33 |
It's fine as it is for me ;). |
Archives