1 |
Am Sonntag, 17. Juni 2012, 11:52:48 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: |
2 |
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
3 |
> > So, while we're meta-discussing Linus' rant on Gnome3, here's an article |
4 |
> > from TechRadar exploring the usability of the leading Linux desktop |
5 |
> > environments. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/whats-the-best-li |
8 |
> > nux-desktop-environment-1045280 |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Summary: Try the latest KDE. You might get pleasantly surprised. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> In my humble opinion, you should use whatever you actually like. You |
13 |
> don't like GNOME? Then don't use it; and if you used it before and |
14 |
> don't like the new version, either get involver to get it "fixed" (for |
15 |
> whatever defintion of "fixed" you want), fork it (although maybe you |
16 |
> should first try Unity, MATE, or Cinnamon before), or go to another |
17 |
> desktop. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I like GNOME 3, therefore I use it. I like systemd, therefore I use |
20 |
> it. I like Emacs, therefore I use it. If someone else wants to use |
21 |
> KDE, OpenRC, and Vim, it's none of my business. To each his own. |
22 |
|
23 |
one question - how can you call something that doesn't even let you change the |
24 |
fonts call a 'desktop environment'? |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
#163933 |