1 |
2014-08-18 19:03 GMT-03:00 Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 18/08/2014 23:17, Grant Edwards wrote: |
4 |
> > On 2014-08-18, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> >> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:21 PM, J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> |
6 |
> wrote: |
7 |
> >>> |
8 |
> >>> In cases like that I would do either of the following: |
9 |
> >>> |
10 |
> >>> 1) Run it inside a VM |
11 |
> >>> 2) run it inside a chroot |
12 |
> >>> |
13 |
> >>> That way you can easily keep everything updated except for that |
14 |
> >>> application. |
15 |
> >> |
16 |
> >> Or better still run it inside a container. |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > Or better still, demand either a less broken app or one that's |
19 |
> > statically linked. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> |
22 |
> That was my thought too. The app is a visual differ. It's not rocket |
23 |
> science, so what business does it have needing a custom glibc? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> My spidey-sense is tingling, I'm wondering what other weirdnesses such |
26 |
> an app might have under the covers |
27 |
> |
28 |
> |
29 |
> -- |
30 |
> Alan McKinnon |
31 |
> alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
Just m 2 cents: Have you tried kdiff3 ? |
37 |
|
38 |
Good luck and best regards, |
39 |
Francisco |