From: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons? | ||
Date: | Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:33:42 | ||
Message-Id: | 0fa56046dbf46a92723f588f2b458deb53771c5c.camel@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons? by Frank Steinmetzger |
1 | On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 22:19 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: |
2 | > |
3 | > For the record: The checks in run-crons that I referred to earlier are |
4 | > actually more for those cases in which the machine was powered off for a |
5 | > while in order to restore cron completeness as early as possible after boot. |
6 | > |
7 | |
8 | The run-crons quackery has been causing problems since 2004: |
9 | |
10 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/69777 |
11 | |
12 | One-liners with run-parts (NOT run-crons) are a lot more predictable. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons? | Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@×××.de> |