| 1 |
Am 09.12.2010 18:14, schrieb Neil Bothwick: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:08:42 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Wouldn't it be even more efficient (in terms of not wasting space) to |
| 4 |
>> create that 6-devices-RAID1 smaller, for /boot and a second array, with |
| 5 |
>> RAID6, for / ? |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Less space wasted, higher redundancy for / ... ? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Since / only needs about 200MB, space isn't really an issue, and RAID1 |
| 10 |
> gives the highest redundancy. The main reason I don't put / on a higher |
| 11 |
> RAID level is that it adds the complication of another filesystem and |
| 12 |
> partition on each drive. / + one LVM keeps it nice and simple. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
OK, I see your point. My / is usually bigger, it seems that you use |
| 15 |
other/more separate partitions/LVs for stuff like /var etc. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Thanks for that, Stefan |
Archives