| 1 |
2008/2/7, ionut cristian cucu <cuciferus@×××××.com>: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> ncpufreqd will not start but it doesn't print any errors either. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
have you set the /etc/ncpufreqd.conf? also, have you started cpufrequtils as |
| 7 |
a daemon and loaded the various cpufreq modules?! |
| 8 |
without them ncpufreqd won't work. to see if it starts try looking at the |
| 9 |
system log. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
But |
| 12 |
> strange issue: I did a test: MAKEOPTS="-j" emerge amarok and guess |
| 13 |
> what the temp did not budge a degree over 50, but this morning as I'm |
| 14 |
> writing this my cpu is on 62% usage but the temp is 95 degrees. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
it's impossible for the thermal to be at only 50 when compiling unlimited |
| 18 |
jobs. maybe the temp you're seeing is the core and not the thermal one. it |
| 19 |
makes sense that core is at 50° and thermal at 95°. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
This |
| 22 |
> puzzles me. Stopping any emerge process did help, but last night it |
| 23 |
> went for hours with full 100% CPU load and now it overheats with |
| 24 |
> "-j1". It is clear, to me, that something somewhere is wicked. |
| 25 |
> LATER: I've just noticed that TZ01 in kima was 0 rebooting set it to |
| 26 |
> 50 and now with emerge keeping the cpu at max speed and load gives me |
| 27 |
> only 55 degrees. So how I will do a kernel update maybe will fix my |
| 28 |
> problem, because it looks to me like it's comming from there. Isn't |
| 29 |
> it? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
then the tz01 is the processor core thermal and not the thermal itself. then |
| 33 |
you should have another thermal zone other than TZ01. try looking in the |
| 34 |
/proc/acpi. or better do a ls -lR /proc/acpi > proc-contents.txt and append |
| 35 |
it here. it might be useful to see what your proc contains. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
dott. ing. beso |
Archives