1 |
felix@×××××××.com, mused, then expounded: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> It absolutely is just like a car, or a house, or anything else. If my |
4 |
> house could only be modified by the original builder, it would never |
5 |
> be modified -- I'd never even get a picture hung for want of being |
6 |
> able to put a nail in a stud. Now maybe I can't add a drawbridge to |
7 |
> my house myself, I can't do the welding or design, but my friend |
8 |
> could, and did. |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
And this points out some of the irony I find amusing. If I or someone |
12 |
else wants to add a piece of hardware to a motherboard supporting an |
13 |
Intel processor, not only does it cost lots of money, I have to sign |
14 |
away certain rights for the privledge to do so. And even then, I |
15 |
may not be allowed to do anything at all because it's of no interest to |
16 |
Intel - won't sell enough platforms, or Intel may choose to take my |
17 |
idea and do their own. On the other hand, I pay my money to the |
18 |
HyperTransport Org, agree to contribute bus specific IP back to the |
19 |
the organization, and I'm free to do as I please. Even, with a bit |
20 |
of NDA and some loss of rights, use AMD's cpu socket. But AMD isn't |
21 |
going to stop me from persuing most things. |
22 |
|
23 |
Yet, in all of this, I read that folks most sincere about "freedomware" |
24 |
will gladly go out and by Intel platforms simply because they, or |
25 |
someone else can write code for Intel's graphics chip or because |
26 |
Intel's current platform has great benchmark numbers, even though |
27 |
it limits their choice of hardware - Intel chips, and vendors - |
28 |
only those blessed by Intel with the secret knowledge of their bus. |
29 |
|
30 |
While this isn't meant to be Intel bashing, nor trying to portray |
31 |
AMD as some kind of saintly corporate enitiy. Given the stances |
32 |
that have been expounded here, if it's really good to have choice |
33 |
and freedom in software to avoid lockin, why doesn't this thinking |
34 |
extend to the hardware? Or is it just fine that your Corporate |
35 |
Master is a hardware company? |
36 |
|
37 |
> There is a HUGE difference between slaveryware and freedomware. A |
38 |
> vital essential difference. It is why I run Linux myself. |
39 |
> |
40 |
|
41 |
I run Linux, and Gentoo specifically, because I dislike being told |
42 |
what I can do on my computer and how I am to do it. I run an AMD platform |
43 |
because I dislike being told there is one way my platform shall operate, |
44 |
and from whom I shall buy my chips from. (Note, the what and how, |
45 |
for me doesn't include going without a package manager, nor is |
46 |
messing with CFLAGS of interest to me.) |
47 |
|
48 |
Bob |
49 |
- |
50 |
-- |
51 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |