1 |
Ian McCulloch wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Martin Bergstrand wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Hey guys, this is an interesting debate, but could we please do it someplace |
6 |
>> else? On the forums for example, that way the subscribers of this list don't |
7 |
>> have to wake up to 50+ new off-topic messages from this list. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I agree completely - it would be interesting to see the subscriber stats |
11 |
> for this list; I wouldn't be surprised if it has dropped substantially in |
12 |
> the last couple of days. Certainly if this continues for any longer it |
13 |
> WILL, me included. It isn't that its an uninteresting topic, but it is |
14 |
> COMPLETELY OFF TOPIC! |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Ian McCulloch |
17 |
> |
18 |
I've never understood why people care about off topic threads. It's an |
19 |
*email* list, thus it's reasonable to expect that most people are using |
20 |
an email client or some derivative thereof to read the messages posted |
21 |
to the list. With all modern email clients that I know of, it's |
22 |
absolutely trivial to filter/delete/ignore messages in a specific |
23 |
thread. Given that, it's not like anyone not interested in a particular |
24 |
thread is being forced to read or even *manually* deal with unwanted |
25 |
messages. |
26 |
|
27 |
Conversly as long as the thread is continuing at least some of the list |
28 |
members are interested, exactly what harm does it do to allow an off |
29 |
topic thread to die a natural death as all threads eventually do? |
30 |
|
31 |
OT threads may violate policy, and that may irritate people who are |
32 |
absolute sticklers for strict adherence to the "rules" but beyond that |
33 |
what real damage or harm does it cause, and is such damage or harm |
34 |
sufficient to justify restricting what some valid list members wish to |
35 |
discuss with each other? |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Regards |
39 |
Bob Young |
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |