1 |
Duncan skrev den 2014-08-09 16:58: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> are gentoo users more smart then linkedin ? |
4 |
> Looking at the links, most of them are to |
5 |
|
6 |
linkedin should sanitice not to post invites on maillist, its simple to |
7 |
them to figure out not to |
8 |
|
9 |
> http://www.linkedin.com/blink?simpleRedirect= [long-encoded-link] |
10 |
|
11 |
that is the problem with bit.ly aswell it can be used in abuse :( |
12 |
|
13 |
> Looks to me like some spammer figured out the encoding (probably |
14 |
> something simple like base64) and that the redirect wasn't |
15 |
> linkedin-site- |
16 |
> limited, thus allowing them to mask whatever link they wanted and hide |
17 |
> behind linkedin's formerly not too terrible reputation, tho it's surely |
18 |
> dropping fast due to the spammers now. |
19 |
|
20 |
yep i would try to build a clamav logical signature, but then its me |
21 |
that would be unsubscribed, not the invite spammers, i begin to think i |
22 |
dont need linkedin anymore |
23 |
|
24 |
linkedin even have a ipv6 only mx record, damm, gives warning in every |
25 |
postfix its a no go |
26 |
|
27 |
its a error to make multiple mx hostnames, there should only be one mx |
28 |
pr destinatiion, unless its one of them is a backup mx |
29 |
|
30 |
if three is dual stacked it should be all in one mx, not multiple, while |
31 |
this should only be enforced while not all hostnames is dual stacked ip |
32 |
|
33 |
workaround for linkedin could be to have all mx be dual stacked or add |
34 |
another host ip from another mx host so all is stillo dual stacked not |
35 |
neseserly on hardware host pr mx hostname |
36 |
|
37 |
> I've gotten a few of these via email (my lists are via newsgroup via |
38 |
> gmane, so entirely separate app used) as well, and the tibdixious name |
39 |
> looks familiar, but this is the first I've noticed the redirect-link. |
40 |
|
41 |
with gmail one does not notice problems, that does not mean there is |
42 |
none, thats why i keep my own problems with gentoo :) |