1 |
James William Dumay <i386@××××××××.org> said: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 13:14 +0100, dams@×××.fr wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > James William Dumay <i386@××××××××.org> said: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > > Yeah, I sat down and thought about it some more. Heres what I have come |
8 |
> > > up with. I welcome flames, comments and changes to the document. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > ok, below are my comments |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > > Gentoo Desktop |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > The name cannot be Gentoo Desktop, there is already an official gentoo desktop |
16 |
> > project. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> We can call it what ever we want. |
19 |
|
20 |
name is not a problem |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
[...] |
24 |
|
25 |
> > > |
26 |
> > > Target Audience |
27 |
> > > === |
28 |
> > > "Hobbyist" users coming from other distributions, such as RedHat, Mandrake, SuSE, etc. |
29 |
> > > Small to Medium Enterprise Desktop Roll outs |
30 |
> > > Educational Institutions (Universities, Collages, Secondary and Grade |
31 |
> > > Schools) |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> > the goals are missing : is it just coolness, or security? polishness? |
34 |
> > professionalism? ease of use? etc. redhat is polished, professional, but not |
35 |
> > the easiest to use, for instance. |
36 |
> The goal is to make the modification so simple that my grandmother can use it and as well as it seeming proffessional and easy to use. |
37 |
|
38 |
please don't talk about grand mothers. We need realistic goals. |
39 |
you won't be able to target grandmother use. The only computer a grandmother |
40 |
might be able to use is imho a mac with macos. No other OS has enough ease of |
41 |
use/integration to be able to compete. |
42 |
|
43 |
So let's take as goal : I install gentoo, and I want a perfectly integrated |
44 |
desktop in less than 30 min, with no configuration. |
45 |
|
46 |
> |
47 |
> > > |
48 |
> > > Desktop Environments - Why GNOME? |
49 |
> > > === |
50 |
> > |
51 |
> > I'll cut the rest : for me gnome is NOT the dominant desktop environment. KDE is |
52 |
> > a lot more widely used, more powerfull, more integrated, has more extensions. |
53 |
> > |
54 |
> > [...] |
55 |
> Its also got most of the major companies backing it aswell as the best |
56 |
> accessabile and inclusive applications around. |
57 |
|
58 |
hmmm, well, nautilus integrates badly with mozilla and soffice. epiphany and |
59 |
gnome office are not competitive with koffice and konqueror. metacity is even |
60 |
not integrated as well as kwm. |
61 |
But well this is troll for now. Let try to agree on the concept/goal/need first |
62 |
|
63 |
|
64 |
> > > |
65 |
> > > Gentoo Desktop - The First Step |
66 |
> > > === |
67 |
> > > |
68 |
> > > Milestone 1 |
69 |
> > > - Report on the Applcation and Services needed on Desktop System |
70 |
> > > - System Services - Hardware Detection Services, File/Print Sharing, Printing, etc |
71 |
> > > - Applcations - Office Productivity Tools, Internet Tools, Gaming, etc |
72 |
> > > - Decide on the appropriate virtuals and USE flags needed for user customization of the desktop. |
73 |
> > > - Create gentoo-desktop-x86-2004.0 profile based on the decisions made. |
74 |
> > > - Build system with new profile and report on system usability from an end users perspective, noting specific issues to be discuss and delt with in Milestone 2. |
75 |
> > |
76 |
> > this is a good way to do it. Maybe we should decide before that, |
77 |
> > |
78 |
> > - do we need/want that |
79 |
> Well, if this project was a sucess and went ahead, this could allow |
80 |
> Gentoo to become a prefered and major platform for educational and |
81 |
> enterprise computing. |
82 |
> |
83 |
> > - how should it be integreated/handled by gentoo |
84 |
> For the project itself (initally), we keep it localised as a gdr-project |
85 |
> untill we have ran some trials on the system structure. |
86 |
> As for infransture, we keep the customised desktop componenet away from |
87 |
> the main tree, in its own cvs rep. |
88 |
> |
89 |
> If/when the project comes more mainstream, we can offer a stage/livecd |
90 |
> along with the rest of gentoos releases. |
91 |
> |
92 |
> We should also release as often as the mainline gentoo releases to keep |
93 |
> version numbering in sync as well as the improvments in the mainline. |
94 |
> |
95 |
> Comments and suggestions? |
96 |
|
97 |
How should we decide what is good for the user? What choice to do? All this |
98 |
goes against the gentoo moto : "All of the sudden, Larry the Cow was in |
99 |
control". |
100 |
|
101 |
Finding all the point of configuration, and customization takes a lot of |
102 |
time/ressource, and it can be done properly only when the release of the main |
103 |
gentoo is out. S it's difficult to release on the same deadline, unless it's |
104 |
buggy |
105 |
|
106 |
I have a solution to this problems, but I need more thinking, and I'll write a |
107 |
new mail |
108 |
|
109 |
|
110 |
-- |
111 |
dams |
112 |
|
113 |
-- |
114 |
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |